Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, a 26-year member of the German and California Bar Association, was recently interviewed by RT.com reporter Ben Swann to discuss his latest lawsuit against Facebook's “FactCheckers”.
This is a libel suit, as Dr. Fuellmich works with many scientists and doctors in Europe who have been censored for not promoting the globalists' narrative on COVID. Among them the doctor we introduced yesterday, Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer .
Wolfang Wodard vs FactChecker
The protagonist in Dr. Fuellmich's lawsuit against the FactCheckers is Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg , who 12 years ago denounced the fraud behind the "swine flu". At the time he was a member of the German parliament and the Council of Europe.
Today, Dr. Wodarg's criticisms of PCR tests being used to block the world on COVID are being censored by these “FactCheckers”.
Dr Fuellmich believes that this lawsuit against the “FactCheckers” will impose the burden of proof on them to prove that the PCR test is accurate and that this lawsuit can then be used as a model for similar lawsuits in other countries around the world.
Also in Italy the first complaints against PCR tests started, a topic that we have dealt with with countless articles of complaint and scientific i.
THE COMMITTEE JOINS FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
The German investigative committee Sul Corona has been collecting testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since 10 July 2020.
Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, one of the committee members, has published his testimony that as of this writing it has been viewed by over 1.3 million people in the past 10 days.
The conclusions of the committee are as follows:
- The Corona crisis must be renamed "Corona Scandal"
- The largest civil liability case ever committed
- The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
- Those responsible must be:
- Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
- Sued for civil damages
- There is no excess of mortality in any country
- Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
- 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by incorrect therapies and the transfer of patients to nursing homes where they infected elderly people with a weak immune system
- Doctors and hospitals around the world have been paid to declare Covid-19 dead victims
- Autopsies showed:
- Almost all deaths caused by serious pre-existing conditions
- Most of the dead were very old people
- Sweden (no block) and Great Britain (strict block) have comparable statistics on disease and mortality
- US states with and without blockades have comparable statistics on disease and mortality
- Populations have T cell immunity from previous influenza waves
- Herd immunity requires only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
- Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
- Many scientists call this a PCR test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
- Very healthy and non-infectious people can test positive
- The probability of false positives is 89-94% or almost certain
- Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever seeing the real Wuhan virus from China
- PCR testing is not based on scientific facts regarding infections
- PCR tests are useless for infection detection
- A positive PCR test does not mean that there is an infection or that an intact virus has been found
- Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable, but the WHO has recommended 45 cycles
- The German government has blocked, imposed social distancing / wearing the mask on the basis of one opinion
- The block was imposed when the virus was already retreating
- The blocks were based on non-existent infections
- The former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the crown measures
- Former UK Supreme Court Justice Lord Sumption concluded that there was no factual basis for the panic and no legal basis for crown measures
- The German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended that no autopsies be performed
- The Corona measures do not have a sufficient factual or legal basis, they are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
- No serious scientist gives any validity to the notorious Neil Ferguson's fake computer models that warn of millions of deaths
- The mainstream media has failed to fully report the real facts of the so-called pandemic
- Democracy risks being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
- Drosten (of the PCR test), Tedros of the WHO and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
- Politicians can avoid quarreling with charlatans and criminals by initiating the long overdue public scientific discussion
- Traditional politicians and media have deliberately pushed populations into panic
- The children were calculatedly made to feel responsible "for the painful death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow the Corona rules"
- The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
- We cannot speak of a second wave
- Injuries and damage:
- Evidence of enormous health and economic damage to populations
- The anti-crown measures have:
- killed countless people
- destroyed countless businesses and individuals around the world
- Children are traumatized en masse
- Failures are expected in small and medium-sized enterprises
- A class action must be filed in the United States or Canada, with all interested parties around the world having the opportunity to join
- Companies and self-employed workers must be compensated for damages
Hi. I'm Reiner Fuellmich and I've been a member of the German and California Bar Association for 26 years. I practiced the law mainly as an advocate against fraudulent companies like Deutsche Bank, formerly one of the largest and most respected banks in the world, now one of the most toxic criminal organizations in the world; VW, one of the largest and most respected car manufacturers in the world, known today for its gigantic diesel fraud; and Kuehne and Nagel, the largest shipping company in the world. We're suing a multi-million dollar bribery case.
I am also one of four members of the German investigative committee on the Corona. Since 10 July 2020, this Committee has listened to a large number of testimonies from international scientists and experts to find answers to the questions about the Corona crisis, which more and more people around the world are asking. All the aforementioned cases of corruption and fraud committed by German multinationals pale in the face of the extent of the damage that the crown crisis has caused and continues to cause.
This crisis of the crown, according to what we know today, must be renamed "Scandal Crown" and those responsible for it must be prosecuted and sued for civil damages. On a political level, everything must be done to ensure that no one will ever again find themselves in a position of power that can defraud humanity or attempt to manipulate us with its corrupt programs. And for this reason, I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will support this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile probably turned into the biggest crime against humanity ever committed.
Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with the Nuremberg Trials after World War II, i.e. when they dealt with the leading war criminals of the Third Reich. Crimes against humanity are now regulated in section 7 of the international criminal code. The three main questions to be answered in the context of a judicial approach to the corona scandal are:
- Is there a corona pandemic or is there just a PCR test pandemic? In particular, does a positive PCR test result mean that the person being tested is infected with Covid-19 or does it mean absolutely nothing in relation to Covid-19 infection?
- So-called anti-crown measures, such as lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the world's population from the crown, or these measures only serve to panic people so that believe – no questions asked – that their lives are in danger, so that ultimately the pharmaceutical and technology industries can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests and vaccines, as well as from collecting our genetic fingerprints?
- It is true that the German government has been under massive pressure, more than any other country, by the main protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic, Mr. Drosten, virologist at the Berlin charity hospital; Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and head of the CDC's German equivalent, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros, Head of the World Health Organization or WHO; Why is Germany known as a particularly disciplined country and therefore had to become a model for the rest of the world for its close and obviously successful adherence to the crown measures?
The answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the allegedly new and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in the world, and certainly not here in Germany. But the anti-corona measures, the sole basis of which are the results of the PCR test, which in turn are all based on the German Drosten test, have meanwhile caused the loss of countless human lives and destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals all over the world. In Australia, for example, people are thrown into jail if they don't wear a mask or if they don't wear it properly, as deemed by the authorities. In the Philippines, people who don't wear a mask or don't wear it properly are shot in the head in this sense.
Let me first give you a summary of the facts as they arise today. The most important thing in a lawsuit is to establish the facts, which is to find out what really happened. This is because the application of the law always depends on the facts in question. If I want to prosecute someone for fraud, I can't do it by presenting the facts of a car accident. So what happened here regarding the alleged crown pandemic?
The following facts are, to a large extent, the result of the work of the Corona Investigative Committee. This Committee was founded on 10 July 2020 by four lawyers in order to determine, through the testimonies of international experts and other experts:
- How dangerous is the virus really?
- What is the significance of a positive PCR test?
- What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures, both with respect to the health of the world population and to the world economy?
Let me start with some background information. What happened in May 2019 and then at the beginning of 2020? And what happened 12 years ago with the swine flu that many of you may have forgotten about? In May 2019, the stronger of the two parties ruling Germany in a grand coalition, the CDU, held a global health congress, apparently at the instigation of major players in the pharmaceutical and tech industries. At this Congress, the usual suspects, one might say, have given their speeches. There were Angela Merkel and the German health secretary, Jens Spahn. But there were also other people, who would not necessarily be expected to be present at such a meeting: Professor Drosten, virologist at the Charite hospital in Berlin; Professor Wieler, veterinarian and head of the RKI, the German equivalent of the CDC; as well as Mr. Tedros, philosopher and head of the World Health Organization (WHO). Everyone gave speeches there. Leading lobbyists from the world's two largest health funds, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, were also present and gave speeches. Less than a year later, these same people called the shots in the proclamation of the world crown pandemic, made sure mass PCR tests were used to prove mass infections with Covid-19 around the world and are now pushing for vaccines are invented and sold around the world.
The positive results that the PCR tests delivered, in turn, became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social distancing, and mandatory face masks. It is important to note at this point that the definition of a pandemic was changed 12 years earlier. Until then, a pandemic was considered a worldwide spreading disease leading to many serious illnesses and deaths. Suddenly, and for unexplained reasons, it should have been just a worldwide disease . Many serious illnesses and many deaths were no longer necessary to announce a pandemic. Due to this change, WHO, which is closely intertwined with the global pharmaceutical industry, was able to declare the swine flu pandemic in 2009, resulting in vaccines being produced and sold around the world. based on contracts that have been kept secret until today.
These vaccines proved completely useless because the swine flu ultimately turned out to be a mild flu, and it never became the terrible plague that the pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it would transform, with millions of deaths that would have happened had people not been vaccinated. These vaccines have also led to serious health problems. About 700 children in Europe have become incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now severely disabled forever. Vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers 'money had to be destroyed with even more taxpayers' money. Even then, during the swine flu, the German virologist Drosten was one of those who caused panic in the population, repeating over and over again that the swine flu would cause many hundreds of thousands, even millions of deaths worldwide.
Fast forward to March 2020, when the German Bundestag announced an epidemic situation of national significance, which is the German equivalent of a pandemic in March 2020 and, on the basis of this, a freeze with the suspension of all constitutional rights. essential for an unpredictable time, there was only one opinion on which the federal government in Germany based its decision. In an outrageous violation of the universally accepted principle “ audiatur et altera pars ”, which means that one must also listen to the other party, the only person who heard was Mr. Drosten.
That's the very person whose horrifying panic prognosis turned out to be catastrophically false 12 years ago. We know this because an informant named David Sieber, a member of the Green Party, told us about it. He did so for the first time on August 29, 2020 in Berlin, in the context of an event that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. also attended, and in which both men gave speeches. And he did it later in one of the sessions of our Crown Committee.
The reason he did this was that he had become increasingly skeptical of the official narrative propagated by politicians and the mainstream media. He then made an effort to find out the opinions of other scientists and found them on the Internet. There, he realized that there were a number of very renowned scientists who had a completely different opinion, which contradicted Mr. Drosten's horrible prognosis. They assumed – and still assume – that there was no disease beyond the severity of seasonal flu, that the population had already acquired immunity to T or cruciate lymphocytes against this alleged new virus, and that there was therefore no reason to any special measures, and certainly not for vaccinations.
These scientists include Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University in California, a specialist in statistics and epidemiology, as well as in public health, and at the same time the highest-rated scientist in the world; Professor Michael Levitt, Nobel Prize Winner in Chemistry and also a biophysicist at Stanford University; the German professors Kary Mölling, Sucharit Bhakti, Klud Wittkowski, as well as Stefan Homburg; and now many, many more scientists and doctors around the world, including Dr. Mike Yeadon. Dr. Mike Yeadon is the former vice president and chief science officer of Pfizer, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. I'll talk about him some more later.
In late March, early April 2020, Mr. Sieber approached his Green Party leadership with the knowledge he had accumulated and suggested that they present these other scientific views to the public and explain that, contrary to Mr. In Drosten's doomsday prophecies, there was no reason for the public to panic. Incidentally, Lord Sumption, who served as a judge in the British Supreme Court from 2012 to 2018, had done the same thing at the same time and had come to the same conclusion: that there was no factual basis for the panic and no legal basis. for crown measurements. Similarly, the former president of the German Federal Constitutional Court has expressed – albeit with greater caution – serious doubts about the constitutionality of the crown measures. But instead of taking note of these other views and discussing them with David Sieber, the Green Party leadership declared that Mr. Drosten's panic messages were good enough for the Green Party. Remember, I am not a member of the ruling coalition; I am the opposition. Still, that was good enough for them, just as it had been good enough for the federal government as the basis for its blocking decision, they said. Subsequently, the Green Party leadership called David Sieber a conspiracy theorist, never having considered the content of his information, and then stripped him of his mandates.
Let us now take a look at the current situation regarding the danger of the virus, the complete uselessness of PCR tests for the detection of infections and blocks based on non-existent infections. In the meantime, we know that health systems have never risked being overwhelmed by Covid-19. Conversely, many hospitals remain empty to this day and some are now bankrupt. The hospital ship Comfort , which was docked in New York at the time and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never accommodated more than twenty patients. There was no excess mortality. Studies by Professor Ioannidis and others have shown that coronal mortality is equivalent to that of seasonal flu. Even the photos of Bergamo and New York that were used to show the world that panic was needed turned out to be deliberately misleading.
Then the so-called “Panic Paper”, written by the German Department of the Interior, leaked. Its confidential content shows beyond doubt that, in fact, the population has been deliberately panicked by politicians and the mainstream media. The accompanying irresponsible statements by the head of the RKI – remember the CDC [German] – Mr. Wieler, who repeatedly and excitedly announced that the crown measures must be followed unconditionally by the population without them asking questions, prove that he followed the script verbatim. In his public statements, he continued to announce that the situation was very serious and threatening, although the data compiled by his own institute showed the exact opposite.
Among other things, the "Panic Paper" asks that children feel responsible – and I quote – "for the painful and tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow the rules of the crown", that is, if they do not wash their hands constantly and do not stay away from grandparents. A clarification: in Bergamo the vast majority of deaths, 94% to be exact, turned out not to be the result of Covid-19, but rather the consequence of the government's decision to transfer the sick, probably ill with colds or seasonal flu, from hospitals to nursing homes to make room in hospitals for all Covid patients, who in the end never arrived. There, in nursing homes, they then infected elderly people with severely weakened immune systems, usually due to pre-existing medical conditions. In addition, a previously administered flu shot had further weakened the immune systems of people in nursing homes. In New York, only a few, but by far not all hospitals have been overwhelmed. Many people, most of whom were elderly again and had pre-existing serious medical conditions, and most of whom, had it not been for panic, would have simply stayed home to recover, rushed to the hospitals. There, many of them have been victims of nosocomial infections (or nosocomial infections) on the one hand, and cases of neglect on the other, for example, having been worn a respirator instead of receiving oxygen through an oxygen mask. Once again, to clarify: Covid-19, this is the current state of affairs, is a dangerous disease, just like seasonal flu is a dangerous disease. And, of course, Covid-19,
However, as the autopsies, which were performed in Germany in particular, by the forensic scientist Professor Klaus Püschel in Hamburg have shown, the deaths he examined were almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions, and almost all the people who had died were died very late in life, just like in Italy, in the sense that they had lived beyond their average life expectancy.
In this context, the following should also be mentioned: the German RKI – that is again the equivalent of the CDC – had initially, oddly enough, recommended that no autopsies be performed. And there are numerous credible reports that doctors and hospitals around the world were paid for declaring a deceased person a victim of Covid-19 rather than writing the true cause of death on the death certificate, such as a heart attack or injury from weapon. Without the autopsies, we would never have known that the vast majority of the alleged victims of Covid-19 had died from completely different diseases, but not from Covid-19. The claim that the blockade was necessary because there were so many infections other than SARS-COV-2 and because health systems would be overwhelmed is wrong for three reasons.
A. The block was imposed when the virus was already retreating. When the blockade was imposed, the alleged infection rates were already dropping again.
B. Virus protection already exists due to the immunity of T or cruciate lymphocytes. Aside from the aforementioned blockade that is imposed when infection rates were already falling, there is also immunity of T or cruciate lymphocytes in the general population against the corona viruses contained in any flu or flu wave. That's true, even if a slightly different strain of the coronavirus was at work this time. And this is because the body's immune system remembers every virus it has ever fought in the past, and from this experience it also recognizes an alleged new, but still similar, strain of the corona family virus. Incidentally, this is how the PCR test for the detection of an infection was invented by the now infamous Professor Drosten.
In early January 2020, based on this basic knowledge, Drosten developed his own PCR test, which allegedly detects a SARS-COV-2 infection, without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China, only after learning from social media reporting that something was going on in Wuhan, he began tinkering on his computer with what would become his crown PCR test. For this, he used an old SARS virus, hoping it was sufficiently similar to the alleged new coronavirus strain found in Wuhan. Then, he sent the result of his computer tinkering to China to determine if victims of the alleged novel coronavirus tested positive. They made.
And that was enough for the World Health Organization to sound the pandemic alarm and recommend the worldwide use of the Drosten PCR test for the detection of infections with the virus now called SARS-COV-2. Drosten's opinion and advice were – this must be stressed again – the only source for the German government when it announced the blockade, the rules for social distancing and the obligation to wear masks. And – this must also be stressed once again – Germany has apparently become the center of particularly massive pressure from the pharmaceutical and tech industry because the world, with reference to the supposedly disciplined Germans, would have to do as the Germans do to survive the pandemic. .
C. And this is the most important part of our fact finding: PCR testing is used on the basis of false claims, NOT on the basis of scientific facts regarding infections . In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the claims of Messrs Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do NOT give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone a SARS-COV-2 infection. Not only are PCR tests not expressly approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on the package inserts provided with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly pointed out. Instead, they are simply unable to diagnose any disease. That is: contrary to the claims of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which have been doing since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does NOT mean they are infected with anything, let alone the infectious SARS-COV-2 virus.
Even the CDC of the United States, this institution also agrees with this, and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on coronavirus and PCR tests, dated July 13, 2020. The first bullet point reads:
" Viral RNA detection may not indicate the presence of infectious viruses or that 2019 nCOV [novel coronavirus ] is the causative agent of clinical symptoms ."
The second bullet on the list says:
" The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring the treatment of nCOV 2019 infection ". The third bullet point on the list says: " This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens ."
It is still unclear whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation of the Wuhan virus , so that no one knows exactly what we are looking for when we test it, especially since this virus, just like flu viruses, mutates rapidly. PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified over many cycles to make it visible . Anything over 35 cycles is – as reported by the New York Times and others – considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable. However, the Drosten test, as well as the WHO-recommended tests that followed its lead, are set to 45 cycles. Could it be due to the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thus provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?
The test cannot distinguish between inactive and reproductive matter. This means that a positive result can occur because the test detects, for example, a fragment of debris, a fragment of a molecule, which cannot signal anything other than that the immune system of the person tested has won a battle with a common cold. in the past. Drosten himself also stated in an interview with a German business magazine in 2014, at that time concerning the alleged detection of a MERS virus infection, presumably with the help of the PCR test, that these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people can test positive . At that time, he also became very aware of the powerful role of a panic and fear media, as you will see at the end of the following quote. He later said in this interview: “ If, for example, such a pathogen runs on a nurse's nasal mucosa for a day or so without her getting sick or noticing anything, then suddenly it's a case of MERS. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the media have turned this into an incredible sensation “.
Have you forgotten this? Or is it deliberately hiding it in the context of the crown because the crown is a very profitable business opportunity for the pharmaceutical industry as a whole? And for Mr. Alford Lund, his co-author in many studies and also a PCR test manufacturer. In my opinion, it is completely unlikely that in 2020 he forgot what he knew about PCR tests and told the business magazine in 2014.
In short, this test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all the false claims that it can. An infection, a so-called "hot" infection, requires that the virus, or rather a fragment of a molecule that may be a virus, is not just somewhere, for example, in a person's throat without causing any harm – it would be a "cold" infection. Rather, a "hot" infection requires the virus to enter the cells, replicate there, and cause symptoms such as a headache or sore throat. Only then is a person truly infected in the sense of a "hot" infection, because only then is a person contagious, ie capable of infecting others. Until then, it is completely harmless to both the host and all other people the host comes into contact with.
Again, this means that positive test results, contrary to all other claims by Drosten, Wieler, or the WHO , mean nothing with respect to infections, as the CDC also knows, as quoted above.
Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists around the world assume that there has never been a corona pandemic, only a PCR test pandemic . This is the conclusion reached by many German scientists, such as Professors Bhakti, Reiss, Mölling, Hockertz, Walach and many others, including the aforementioned Professor John Ioannidis and Nobel laureate Professor Michael Levitt of Stanford University.
The most recent opinion is that of the aforementioned Dr. Mike Yeadon , former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years. He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific article in September 2020 and wrote a corresponding article in the journal on September 20, 2020. Among other things, he and they state – and I quote:
“ We are basing our government policy, our economic policy and the policy of limiting fundamental rights, presumably on completely wrong data and assumptions about the coronavirus. If it weren't for the test results that are constantly being reported in the media, the pandemic would have ended because nothing really happened. Sure, there are some serious individual cases of the disease, but there are also some in every flu epidemic. There was a real spate of disease in March and April, but everything has since returned to normal. Only the positive results rise and sink wildly again and again, depending on how many tests are done. But the real cases of the disease are over. We cannot speak of a second wave. The alleged new coronavirus strain is … "
– continues Dr. Yeadon –
“… Only new in that it is a long-known new type of the corona virus. There are at least four endemic coronaviruses and they cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in the winter. They all have striking sequence similarity to the coronavirus, and as the human immune system recognizes the similarity to the virus which has now allegedly been recently discovered, a T cell immunity has long existed in this regard. 30% of the population had this before the alleged new virus even appeared . Therefore, it is enough for so-called herd immunity that 15-25% of the population is infected with the alleged novel coronavirus to stop the further spread of the virus. And this has long been the case . "
Regarding the all-important PCR tests, Yeadon writes, in an article titled " Lies, Damn Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False Positives ", dated September 20, 2020, and I quote
" The probability that an apparently positive case is a false positive is between 89 and 94%, or almost a certainty ."
Dr Yeadon, in agreement with the immunology professors Kamera from Germany, Kappel from the Netherlands and Cahill from Ireland, as well as microbiologist Dr Arve from Austria, who all testified before the German Crown Committee, explicitly points out that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.
The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is – and I quote:
" Simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus, which could be a dead piece of virus, which cannot make the subject sick, cannot be transmitted and cannot make anyone else sick ".
Due to the total inadequacy of the test for detecting infectious diseases – tested positive for goats, sheep, papaya and even chicken wings – Professor Carl Heneghan of Oxford, director of the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, writes that the Covid virus it would not disappear if this testing practice were to be continued, but would always be falsely detected in much of what is tested. Blocks, as Yeadon and his colleagues found, don't work. Sweden, with its laissez-faire approach, and Great Britain, with its strict blockade, for example, have completely comparable disease and mortality statistics. The same was found by US scientists regarding the different US states. It makes no difference to the incidence of the disease whether a state implements a block or not.
Of the now infamous Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London and his completely bogus computer models that warn of millions of deaths, he says – and I quote: " No serious scientist gives any validity to Ferguson's model." He points with barely veiled contempt – I quote again:
" It's important that you know, most scientists don't accept that …" – that is, Ferguson's model – "he was also vaguely right. But the government is still tied to the model . Ferguson predicted 40,000 deaths per crown in Sweden by May and 100,000 by June, but it remained at 5,800 which, according to the Swedish authorities, amounts to a mild flu. If PCR tests had not been used as a diagnostic tool for corona infections, there would have been no pandemic and no blockages, but everything would have been perceived as a wave of medium or light flu, these scientists conclude. Dr. Yeadon in his piece, " Lies, Damn Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False Positives, writes:" This test is fatally flawed and must be immediately withdrawn and never used again in this context, unless it is proved that it was fixed . And, towards the end of that article, I explained how a diagnostic test that works hopelessly has been and continues to be used, not for diagnosing the disease, it just seems to create fear .
Let us now take a look at the current situation regarding the serious damage caused by blockades and other measures. Another detailed document was recently leaked, written by a German official from the Department of the Interior, responsible for risk assessment and protection of the population from risks. It is now called the “False Alarm” document. This paper comes to the conclusion that there was and is not sufficient evidence for serious health risks to the population as stated by Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, but – says the author – there is a lot of evidence of corona measures. that cause gigantic health and economic damage to the population, which he then describes in detail in this article. This, he concludes, will lead to very high damage claims, for which the government will be held accountable.
More and more scientists, but also lawyers, recognize that, as a result of the deliberate alarmism and crown measures made possible by this panic, democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models. As I mentioned above, in Australia, people who don't wear masks, which more and more studies show, are dangerous to health, or who presumably don't wear them correctly, are arrested, handcuffed and thrown in jail. In the Philippines they run the risk of being shot, but also in Germany and other previously civilized countries, children are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with quarantine regulations, distance regulations and mask-wearing regulations. According to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified before the Crown Committee, the children are traumatized en masse, with the worst psychological consequences still to be expected in the medium and long term. In Germany alone, bankruptcies should hit small and medium-sized enterprises, which form the backbone of the economy, in the autumn. This will result in incalculable tax losses and incalculable, long-term social security money transfers for – among other things – unemployment benefits.
Since, in the meantime, virtually everyone is starting to understand the full devastating impact of completely unfounded corona measures, I will refrain from detailing this further.
Let me now give you a summary of the legal consequences. The hardest part of a lawyer's job is always establishing the true facts, not applying the legal rules to these facts. Unfortunately, a German lawyer doesn't learn this in law school, but his Anglo-American counterparts receive the necessary training for this at their law school. And probably for this reason, but also for the much more marked independence of the Anglo-American judiciary, the law of the Anglo-American trial is in practice much more effective than the German one. A court can only correctly decide a legal dispute if it has previously correctly determined the facts, which is not possible without examining all the evidence. And this is why the law of proof is so important. On the basis of the facts summarized above, in particular those ascertained with the help of the work of the German Crown Committee, the legal assessment is actually simple. It's simple for all civil legal systems, regardless of whether these legal systems are based on civil law, which more closely follows Roman law, or if they are based on Anglo-American common law,
Let's first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the measures. Several professors of German law, including professors Kingreen, Morswig, Jungbluth and Vosgerau, have declared themselves, in written reports or in interviews, in line with the serious doubts expressed by the former president of the Federal Constitutional Court regarding the constitutionality of the measures corona, that these measures – the corona measures – lack a sufficient factual basis, and also without a sufficient legal basis, and are therefore unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately. Recently, a judge, Thorsten Schleif is his name, publicly stated that the German judiciary, just like the general public, has been so panicked that it is no longer able to administer justice properly. He says that the courts – and I quote – “have agitated all too quickly coercive measures which, for millions of people across Germany, represent massive suspensions of their constitutional rights. He stresses that German citizens – I quote again – "are currently experiencing the most serious violation of their constitutional rights since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949". To contain the crown pandemic, federal and state governments intervened, he says, massively and in part threatening the very existence of the country, as guaranteed by the constitutional rights of the people. He stresses that German citizens – I quote again – "are currently experiencing the most serious violation of their constitutional rights since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949". To contain the crown pandemic, federal and state governments intervened, he says, massively, and in part threatening the very existence of the country as guaranteed by the constitutional rights of the people. He stresses that German citizens – I quote again – "are currently experiencing the most serious violation of their constitutional rights since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949". To contain the crown pandemic, federal and state governments have intervened, he says, massively and in part threatening the very existence of the country, as guaranteed by the constitutional rights of the people.
What about fraud, willful infliction of harm and crimes against humanity?
Under the rules of criminal law, the assertion of false PCR test facts or intentional misrepresentations , as committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and WHO, as well as by WHO, can only be assessed as fraud. Under the rules of civil law, this results in intentional infliction of damages. German civil law professor Martin Schwab supports this finding in public interviews. In a complete legal opinion of about 180 pages, he familiarized himself with the subject like no other law scholar has done so far and, in particular, gave a detailed account of the complete failure of the mainstream media to report the true facts of this. so-called pandemic. Messrs Drosten, Wieler and Tedros of WHO all knew, based on their experience or the experience of their institutions, that PCR tests cannot provide any information about infections, but have stated time and time again to the general public that they can , with their counterparts around the world repeating it. very serious danger to health, as independent studies and expert statements show more and more. According to the rules of civil law, all those who have been harmed by these blockages induced by the PCR test are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses. In particular, there is an obligation to compensate, that is, a duty to compensate for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed workers as a result of the blockade and other measures.
In the meantime, however, anti-crown measures have caused and continue to cause so devastating damage to the health and economy of the world's population that the crimes committed by Messrs Drosten, Wieler and the WHO must be legally qualified as actual crimes against humanity. , as defined in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
How can we do something? What can we do? Well, collective action is the best way to obtain compensatory damage and political consequences. The so-called class action is based on English law and exists today in the United States and Canada. It allows a court to allow a claim for damages to be tried as a class action at the request of a plaintiff if:
- As a result of a damage inducing event …
- A large number of people suffer the same type of damage.
Worded differently, a judge can allow a class lawsuit to proceed if common issues of law and fact form the vital component of the lawsuit. Here, the common questions of law and fact revolve around the blocks based on world-wide PCR tests and their consequences. Just as VW diesel passenger cars were working products, but were defective due to a so-called defeat device because they did not comply with emissions standards, so too are PCR tests – which are perfectly good products in other contexts – are defective products when it is a diagnosis of infections. Now, if an American or Canadian company or an American or Canadian individual decides to sue these individuals in the United States or Canada for damages, the court called to resolve this dispute may, upon request,
If this happens, all interested parties around the world will be informed through publications in the major media and thus will have the opportunity to participate in this collective action within a certain period of time, which will be determined by the court. It should be emphasized that no one should participate in the class action, but any injured party can join the class.
The advantage of class action is that only one trial is required , namely to prove the complaint of a representative actor who is interested in a way that is typical of everyone else in the class. This is, firstly, cheaper, and secondly, faster than hundreds of thousands or more individual lawsuits. Third, it imposes a lesser burden on the courts. Fourth, it as a rule allows for a much more precise examination of the allegations than would be possible in the context of hundreds of thousands, or more likely in this context crowns, even millions of individual lawsuits.
In particular, the well-established and proven Anglo-American Law of Evidence applies, with its pre-trial discovery. This requires that all evidence relevant to the determination of the cause be put on the table. Contrary to the typical situation of German cases with structural imbalance, ie cases involving a consumer on the one hand and a powerful company on the other, the rejection or even destruction of evidence is not without consequences; rather the party that denies or even destroys the evidence loses the cause under these rules of evidence.
Here in Germany, a group of civil liability lawyers got together to help their clients recover their damages. They have provided all relevant information and forms for German plaintiffs to both estimate how much harm they have suffered and to join the group or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when it takes place in Canada or the United States. Initially, this group of lawyers had considered collecting and handling the damages claims of other non-German plaintiffs as well, but this proved unmanageable.
However, through an international network of lawyers, which is growing by the day, the group of German lawyers provides all colleagues in all other countries, free of charge, with all relevant information, including expert opinions and expert testimony that show that PCR tests cannot detect infections. They also provide them with all relevant information on how to prepare and group their clients 'claims for damages so that they too can enforce their clients' claims, both in the courts of their home country and within. the class action framework, as explained above.
These scandalous facts of the crown, collected primarily by the Crown Committee and summarized above, are the same facts that will soon be proven to be true in one court or in many courts around the world.
These are the facts that will remove the masks from the faces of all those responsible for these crimes. To politicians who believe those corrupt people, these facts are offered here as a lifeline that can help you readjust your course of action and start the long-overdue public scientific discussion, and not go down with those charlatans and criminals.
This is a machine translation from Italian language of a post published on DataBase Italia at the URL https://www.databaseitalia.it/il-comitato-investigativo-tedesco-sul-corona-intenta-causa-contro-i-factchecker-costringendoli-a-dimostrare-la-legittimita-dei-test-covid/ on Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:18:01 +0000.