Codacons launched an initiative that risks having very strong objective and controversial repercussions and that starts from the recent case of the death of the young Camilla Canepa, who died following the inoculation of the Astra Zeneca vaccine, and following the fact that young people were also vaccinated with Astra Zeneca-Vaxevia, even though this had long been recommended only for over sixty-year-olds. . let's see what their site says:
The Association, although obviously in favor of the vaccination campaign to reduce the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, has decided to intervene to protect Italian citizens. For this, he has decided to proceed on two distinct levels.
1) On the case of the death of Camilla Canepa, who died after having received the first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine, we presented a complaint to the Public Prosecutor of Genoa asking to register the Minister of Health Roberto Speranza, Commissioner Francesco Paolo Figliuolo in the register of suspects. and the competent ASL (the whole ASL? only the president?).
2) Furthermore, we provide interested citizens with a warning to request compensation for damage, which contemplates three different cases :
a) Compensation for non-pecuniary damage caused by the fear of getting sick due to having received the administration of the Astrazeneca vaccine authorized by the competent Italian authorities: this is damage now recognized by the Law for several years in particular following the well-known "Seveso case" of 1976 ( where the moral damage complained of by subjects who concretely prove that they have suffered a psychic disturbance of a transitory nature due to exposure to pollutants has been recognized independently compensable, even in the absence of an injury to the psycho-physical integrity ascertained or otherwise productive event of pecuniary damage – Cassation no. 2515 of 21 February 2002). This damage can be quantified as a lump sum in the amount of 10,000 euros .
b) Compensation for non-pecuniary-biological damage, permanent or temporary damage, also in terms of differential damage, reported for having been subjected to the Astrazeneca vaccination, subject to specific indication and quantification.
c) The compensation provided for by Law 201/92 to be paid by the State for having been subjected to vaccination from which the permanent psychophysical impairment derives to be evaluated and quantified below (to be indicated if existing).
Those who join can find the form to be completed at this link .
Therefore, on a flat-rate basis, the Codacons evaluates to ask for a refund related to the damages for having feared the vaccination with Astra Zeneca to which to add other possible damages, in addition to the criminal investigation on Speranza, Figliuolo and the ASL of competence, even if it is not indicated who would be responsible. An initiative that, as we have said, will certainly make noise. However, sooner or later someone will have to tell us who has thought of using Astra Zeneca on 18 and 20 year olds, or just who has decided to vaccinate them.
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/0-mila-euro-di-risarcimento-per-ogni-vaccinato-astra-zeneca-under-60-uniniziativa-che-fara-discutere/ on Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:03:58 +0000.