“I took the Conte decrees to court to save a shop”.
A shop that should close because it is considered, who knows why, "Not essential", decides to stay open and turns to a lawyer in order not to pay the penalties of the DPCM contrary to logic.
Here is the practical case: the assisted happened AntonioGiannotti lawyer, that by selling animal feed, at dawn on December 3, 2020 opened the damper, considering an essential commodity like other grocery stores, and therefore in line with Dpcm just issued. This was not the case, so the police closed his shop and handed him a € 400.00 fine.
Obviously the operator did not let the Dpcm slip on him, which in its more cynical side punished him while he was in good faith. From there the possibility of a turning point arises: from the ruling that will take place in May on the forced closure of his shop, and therefore on the legitimacy of all the closures of those who will not be able to hear for another year "stay at home". By order of the judge, the shop is now open, complete with a torn fine.
The lawyer tells everything to RadioRadio, the program “A special day”, stating that, on a temporary basis, he obtained the suspension of the sanction, also appealing to have the constitutionality of the Law decrees underlying the Prime Minister's Decree assessed. The closing order is suspended until May, when it will be known what will happen to the sanction and the constitutional appeal.
Have a good listening
Thanks to our Telegram channel you can stay updated on the publication of new articles of Economic Scenarios.
The article "I took the Conte decrees to court, to save a shop". comes from ScenariEconomici.it .
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/ho-portato-i-decreti-conte-in-tribunale-per-salvare-un-negozio/ on Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:30:53 +0000.