India surrenders: $8 billion to Germany for submarines. The failure of New Delhi’s military autarky.

Indian Prime Minister Modi's mantra, " Atmanirbhar Bharat " (self-reliant India), appears to have run aground on the shoals of bureaucracy and technological reality. As New Delhi prepares to welcome German Chancellor Friedrich Merz next week, a hefty check is on the table: over $8 billion for the purchase of six diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs).

The deal involves German giant Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems (TKMS) and Indian state-owned shipyard Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd (MDL) . While it strengthens the Indian fleet, it also confirms the failure of the rapid and autarchic acquisition strategy pursued over the past decade.

Taking a step back: What is India buying?

In August 2024, the Indian Ministry of Defense gave the green light to the construction of these vessels under Project 75I . We're not talking about old junk, but submarines equipped with air-independent propulsion (AIP) , a technology that allows the vessel to remain submerged much longer than conventional diesel-electric vessels, reducing the need to return to periscope depth to recharge their batteries and, therefore, reducing their vulnerability to enemy radar.

TKMS, which initially refused to participate in the tender due to “terms and conditions” deemed unacceptable, only re-entered the game after receiving strong political support from Berlin.

The Indian paradox: nuclear yes, diesel no?

Here, a question arises that intrigues the attentive observer of industrial dynamics. India has already built four nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and is building two more attack submarines (SSNs). How is it possible that a nation capable of mastering naval nuclear technology must import conventional submarines from Germany, after having already acquired seven ( Scorpene- class) from France?

There are essentially two hypotheses on the table:

• The technology transfer bluff: Perhaps nuclear submarines and Scorpenes are only “Made in India” on the surface, assembled with foreign kits (perhaps Russian or French) without any real acquisition of industrial know-how.
• The geopolitics of procurement: The Indian government continues to use military procurement as a tool of “captatio benevolentiae” towards Western powers, sacrificing economic efficiency on the altar of diplomatic relations.

The fatal mistake: wanting everything right away (without knowing how to do it)

Speculation aside, the stark reality is that Project 75I , the indigenous attack submarine, is ten years behind schedule due to ambitious quality requirements (QRs). The Indian Navy wanted the “dream submarine.”

• Built entirely in Indian shipyards.
• Equipped with AIP system developed locally by DRDO (Indian research body).
• Armed with Indian missiles and torpedoes.
• Made with Indian steel.
• Full intellectual property in India's hands to be able to export the design.

The result? No global OEM could meet these demands. No one wants to hand over a complex and advanced design like an attack submarine only to have it copied and resold at a low cost by Indian shipyards. The requirements were watered down year after year, turning a race for self-sufficiency into a desperate march to replace an aging fleet. In the end, only Germany and Spain remained in the race, but Spain's Navantia lacked an operationally submerged AIP system. So, only Berlin remained.

Germany thanks and cashes in

For Germany and TKMS, this is a major coup. The German conglomerate, which was plagued by financial doubts a year ago, is now in excellent health thanks to orders from Norway and Singapore and the modernization of the German fleet.

The final irony? India will purchase a modified version of the Type 214 , not a completely new or "custom" design as it initially dreamed, but rather a design already sold to the Greek, Portuguese, and Turkish navies. The latter, a force in close contact with the Pakistani navy, New Delhi's traditional adversary.

Not only is the U214 model made of high-strength steel, it is not non-magnetic like the U212A models used by the Italian Navy. Furthermore, it does not use the modern lithium batteries of the U212 NFS , currently under construction.

If the Indian Navy had set realistic requirements ten years ago, local giants like L&T (which has experience with nuclear hulls) could have developed a domestic platform, perhaps integrating the formidable Brahmos vertical-launch missiles, something that won't happen now. Or an agreement could have been signed with, say, Fincantieri, for the development of a new model, but with the contribution of foreign technology.

Instead of an autonomous and export-oriented industry, New Delhi finds itself with a huge bill and the knowledge that autarky, without pragmatism, remains just an electoral slogan.

---

Questions and Answers

Why did India choose German submarines?

The choice fell on Germany primarily for technical and reliability reasons. The TKMS has a proven and operational air-independent propulsion (AIP) system, unlike its Spanish competitor Navantia. Furthermore, the Indian shipyard MDL has a historic relationship with the Germans, dating back to the 1980s with the Shishumar -class submarines. The urgent need to renew the fleet forced India to focus on a safe solution rather than wait for uncertain developments.

What is the AIP system and why is it so important?

AIP (Air Independent Propulsion) is a technology that allows non-nuclear submarines to operate underwater for extended periods, up to two weeks, without having to surface or use a snorkel to take in air for their diesel engines. This dramatically reduces the submarine's acoustic and radar signature, making it much stealthier and harder to detect than conventional submarines, which must frequently expose hull portions to recharge their batteries.

Has India failed in its military “Made in India” project?

In this specific case, yes. Excessive bureaucratic ambition has paradoxically harmed local industry. By imposing unrealistic requirements (such as the exclusive use of immature local technologies and materials) and demanding full intellectual property rights, the government has alienated foreign partners and wasted a decade. Had they accepted a more gradual approach, Indian companies like L&T could have acquired real expertise, instead of having to resort to emergency purchases from abroad.

The article India Surrenders: 8 Billion to Germany for Submarines. The Failure of New Delhi's Military Autarky comes from Scenari Economici .

---

This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/lindia-si-arrende-8-miliardi-alla-germania-per-i-sottomarini-il-fallimento-dellautarchia-militare-di-nuova-delhi/ on Sat, 10 Jan 2026 14:38:18 +0000.