Maieutics
(… discours de la méthode …)
You say that I am bad, but it is not true and I show it to you.
Following the previous post, an intelligent friend (it is not a spelling error, it is a political error that can be summarized in this sentence ), to give the jab, cites one of his shared contributions. Dialogue follows (because I dialogue with real ones)
Seen? I'm not bad. It is the others who are afraid. Because?
(… eight hours later I am still unanswered, despite having urged it. So. When I said that no class consciousness was built on the sting, I was not belittling the topic of side effects, as some cretin * is braying around for the web, and I think I have shown it since I think I am one of the few willing to work – that is, not willing to retire in the paradise of narcissists, aka mixed group – to have raised it in the courtroom to a rather aphasic minister. slowly you are seeing: that is that that pool of discontents for justified reasons would have become the food of a potential 4.0 grillism – also because the stupid orthoptera are not, and exactly like the "best", of which they are the economy version, they use a theme to we divided in order to divide us – surprising, right? The work we are doing exposes us to this risk, just as those who do not want to understand it do not understand. Let's say that after this post I do not think I should or more to give the benefit of the doubt to the interlocutors. If this is not understood, I do not know how to make it understood. It should also be said that when a man with intelligence (sic) meets a man with maieutics, the man with intelligence remains mute. The answer to the last question is obvious: to build a ruling class you have to make sacrifices, you have to sacrifice the consent of the voters, that is to enter the government by renouncing to vellitate their narcissism , instead of staying out and glogling wattles in the wind, feathered standard bearers of a misunderstood and ill-digested idea! But this good Luca, with all that he is a friend, does not want to admit it, although he leads his own reasoning there, because he prefers to remain in his nice circle of betrayed lovers, eheh, and similar residues of Casabau. De gustobus non est disputandum. But I hope that you too recognize – because Luca explains it well – that if you don't enter you are ineffective, because you are unable to build a ruling class. With these premises: you, from me, de precise, what the fuck do you want me to do? … )
(… I apologize for the swear word, but it is a quote, and the needs of philology prevailed over those of the bon ton. I am still waiting for an answer …)
This is a machine translation of a post (in Italian) written by Alberto Bagnai and published on Goofynomics at the URL https://goofynomics.blogspot.com/2022/04/maieutica.html on Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:17:00 +0000. Some rights reserved under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.