Who wins and who loses between Storari, Salvi and Greco
The deputy prosecutor of Milan Paolo Storari was confirmed in his place after the transfer due to environmental incompatibility requested by the Attorney General of the Cassation Giovanni Salvi
As in politics with the story of the glass half full or half empty, according to the interpretations of part of the compromise on duty, so with the verdict of the Superior Council of the Judiciary on the deputy prosecutor of Milan Paolo Storari – confirmed in his place after the transfer due to environmental incompatibility asked by the Attorney General of the Cassation Giovanni Salvi – they split between the "acquitted" Storari, or in any case left where he is, of the Fatto Quotidiano and the Corriere della Sera and the "beaten" Salvi of the Riformista and, with less evidence, of the Truth . There were also those who, like the Republic , preferred to remove the topic from the front page in order not to make a mistake, preferring others offered by current events.
The propensity in favor of the prosecution, as usual in those parts, was betrayed by the Fatto Quotidiano by writing on the headline that "now we will see who really made a mistake". Yet it is clear that it was the Attorney General of the Cassation who made a mistake, whose request to transfer Storari was rejected, or rejected, as preferred. We are not talking about the prompt solidarity gathered by Storari among Ambrosian colleagues.
It has been written somewhere, perhaps not even wrongly, that Salvi earned or earned defeat by mistake of motivation, having requested the transfer of Storari not so much for what he had done – demanding immediate investigations into the revelations of the lawyer Piero Amara about a Masonic lodge called "Hungary", from a Roman square of the same name, of great influence on the judiciary and passing the minutes to the then superior councilor Piercamillo Davigo – as well as the "media coverage" of the affair.
In fact, the motivation was too modest compared to the merits of the conflict objectively exploded in the Milan Public Prosecutor's Office, whose head Francesco Greco was also under investigation in Brescia. Where I do not know if it will be enough for him, to come out unscathed a few months after retirement, to renounce "the treachery and lies" contested to the substitute, so to speak, rebellious. Which demanded the formal opening of investigations with the sole or prevalent fault of thus jeopardizing the credibility of sources used by the Ambrosian prosecutor in a trial for international corruption then lost against Eni, of which Amara had been an external lawyer.
Moreover, the "media coverage", to stay with the words of the prosecution, had not prevented Salvi in the previous months from evading it in fact in another sensational story: that of Luca Palamara and his participation, first as union leader of robes and then as senior adviser to the judiciary, to the current and politicized management of judicial careers. Regarding which Salvi had practically arranged, I do not even know if he really had the qualifications, that the aids requested or obtained, or both, by the interested parties for the assignment of the offices gradually assigned by the Superior Council could not be judicially challenged.
For those trafficking, let's call them that, of influences in judicial careers Palamara was disbarred from the judiciary, with a decision of the Superior Council just confirmed by the Supreme Court, even before answering in a trial, for which perhaps the interested party is not all wrong, although participant in a system certainly not invented by him but certainly not even exciting, to consider himself a scapegoat at this point.
This is a machine translation from Italian language of a post published on Start Magazine at the URL https://www.startmag.it/mondo/chi-vince-e-chi-perde-fra-storari-salvi-e-greco/ on Thu, 05 Aug 2021 06:23:52 +0000.