BEAKS: WE CAN’T LIVE IN A PERMANT LOCKDOWN. If the former didn’t work, why should the latter?
On FB Conte has published a very short message in which he is proud of the citizens' response to the government's requests and is convinced that "We will get out of it", even if "With a Dierso Christmas". The philosopher Paolo Becchi replies that what is needed is not a different Christmas, but a NORMAL CHRISTMAS.
We respond only with the lockdown, exactly as we responded at the time of the Decameron, as if seven centuries had passed for nothing. Among other things, the approach of the first lockdown is wrong, even the second lockdown seems completely wrong, given the latest data, so what is the government doing? It goes on with the same wrong solution, knowing it won't solve anything. However, the continuation of the Lockdown only shows how democracy and the constitution are canceled by the Lockdown.
Have a good listening.
Thanks to our Telegram channel you can stay updated on the publication of new articles of Economic Scenarios.
The article BEAKS: WE CANNOT LIVE IN A PERMANT LOCKDOWN. If the former didn't work, why should the latter? comes from ScenariEconomici.it .
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/becchi-non-possiamo-vivere-in-un-lockdown-permante-se-il-primo-non-e-servito-perche-dovrebbe-il-secondo/ on Sat, 02 Jan 2021 10:02:40 +0000.