By vaccinating you risk your life, but is it important to do so because you protect the most vulnerable? Paolo Becchi and Giovanni Zibordi
The first thing that should surprise the observer, disenchanted and free from ideological prejudices, is that despite the ongoing mass vaccination there is an explosion of infections especially in the countries with the most vaccinations such as the United Kingdom. These days there have been up to 50,000 cases a day in England, for example, and last year in July there were less than 1,000. It is true that about 4 or 5 times more tampons are made than last year, but here we are talking about 50 times more and even compared to the beginning of the year the increase is impressive
This mere factual observation raises a first question: shouldn't vaccines serve to immunize people from contagion? We can say that at the moment, if this was the goal, it has not been achieved. The most vaccinated country in the world is Abu Dhabi, with around 70% vaccinated, even more than Israel (56%) and the UK (64%). Today the government announced a new partial lockdown, as cases are rising sharply. Something in the official narrative does not add up.
In the United Kingdom for now, the government is ignoring the increase in cases and does not want to close because the deaths are few, but even in July 2020 the deaths were almost gone. In France, mortality is below average, but Macron himself announced that within a couple of months those who are not vaccinated will not be able to access public places, including shopping centers (for supermarkets where you buy food, it is not yet understood. if the ban will apply to the unvaccinated). Alternatively, a positive swab can be provided in the last three days, but while the vaccine is free, the swab is not, so in practice to go shopping or go to a bar, restaurant or gym or theater a citizen should spend a hundred euros on swabs. per week. A couple of days ago, mass protests began in France, with videos of burning barricades that can be seen for example here https://rumble.com/vjv5mk-nuovi-video-dalla-francia-in-rivolta .html (but not to the TG). Here everything is silent, the big media are pushing the government to do as in France. Fortunately Salvini and Meloni resist.
What's happening is crazy. People are pushing for forced mass vaccination to avoid infections, when, thanks to mass vaccinations, infections increase. But there is more.
A well-known expert, daily on television, these days said (we quote word for word): "VACCINATION MEANS RISKING YOUR LIFE, because vaccination has adverse events even if very limited … but I see this as a favoring element vaccination, because it must be seen in a perspective of solidarity with the most fragile elements and the community… ”. What prompted the expert to say "getting vaccinated means risking your life?".
The fact is that you can even die of the vaccine. Every day you can find in the local news at least a couple of cases of healthy people, even sports, who died suddenly of heart failure after vaccination, such as this 49-year-old nurse, obviously vaccinated, for which the prosecutor even opened a investigation,https://www.chietitoday.it/cronaca/miglianico-infermiera-trovata-morta-tamara-orsini.html but the newspapers reporting the case do not mention the obvious suspect, namely the vaccine.
These are not isolated cases, as in Italy we would like to believe. If you go to the American website of VAERS (see here https://vaers.hhs.gov/ ) the total cases with adverse reactions are 400 thousand and among these those of death due to vaccines have now reached 9 thousand (July 2).
In Washington, two Republican senators held a press conference with some vaccine victims and in particular vaccine tests held this summer by Pfizer and Moderna, bringing to the Senate the testimony of women who participated in the trial and now suffer from multiple sclerosis. They wrote an open letter to Moderna CEO Steve Bancel asking for an explanation of the fact that 4% of the test participants then suffered from neurological problems (see https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/services/files/22F4DB50 -66A2-4E40-8F74-50ABBA10A542 ).
It should be noted that Moderna, a company that had been in chronic loss for ten years until 2020, has risen from $ 3 billion to $ 85 billion in stock market value and Bancel personally has seen its wealth grow by around $ 2 billion. A woman that senators have now brought to the US Senate hearing, Brianne Dressen – who also appeared on ABC news – after participating in the Moderna vaccine test has instead accumulated $ 250,000 in medical expenses for multiple sclerosis following the experimental vaccination.
In this regard it should be remembered that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines have been authorized as an exception, but not yet approved because the approval requires at least two years and tests on animals, while in this case everything was done in six months and without animal tests. . Furthermore, the test participants were only followed for two months, so cases such as those of Ms Brianne Dressen who later developed multiple sclerosis were not covered in the study. Put simply, those who underwent the tests under which they were authorized last summer were only followed for two months and the fact that it is now admitted that 4% have had neurological problems (in addition to heart problems that appear in chronicles) was not considered in the tests.
However, it will be said that the vaccine overall protects. It may be, but is the drop in deaths due to vaccines or is it seasonal? Last year there was also a decrease in deaths but vaccines were not yet there. Meanwhile, both in the United Kingdom and in Israel, the Covid deaths (which are few) are now in the majority among the vaccinated. Here, for example, in these days one of the major Israeli newspapers read that 56% of Covid deaths are vaccinated
In America the figure of the proportion of vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths is not easy to find, but for example in Massachusetts we see that there are 79 deaths among the vaccinated.
If we analyze the data we see that in April and May there were no deaths, hospitalizations and infections among the vaccinated, but now they are rising everywhere. Moderna and Pfizer insist on a third dose to be done by the fall and so the vaccine appears to have an effect that perhaps only lasts a few months. In the tests on which they were authorized, no one died, because a sample of healthy people was chosen to have less problems avoiding the elderly and the sick. So based on the tests you can't tell whether or not the vaccine reduces mortality.
At the moment, what can be said is that vaccination for healthy and not very old people is doing harm without offering benefits. The vaccinated get sick again and die too, as the data cited shows. Affirming as the expert does that "you risk your life vaccinating, but it is worth it because you protect the most fragile" is a defensive thesis of the vaccination strategy that seems to be dictated more by despair than by logic.
Statistics show that 99% of Covid deaths were over 64 years old in Italy, so about 50 million out of 60 million Italians have never been at risk for Covid. That these 50 million must all be vaccinated compulsorily or by forcing them in all ways is just an experiment not without dangers that is unprecedented in history. Millions of people who have no risk of disease have never before been vaccinated. It is an experiment, based on licensed vaccines without going through normal drug testing procedures. Even the thesis of "sacrificing oneself" for others is disproved by the boom this month of "contagions" everywhere ("Delta" version). A useless sacrifice because others get sick anyway and I risk my life for nothing.
Basically, let's say a person under 60 and in health has no reason to get vaccinated by meeting some risks that are now documented at the cardiac and even neurological level and ranging from allergies and various ailments up to cases of paralysis, partial blindness. and disability and death. The fact that serious cases of "adverse event" happen to one in 5 thousand people and the media talk about it a little means that they do not notice it in normal daily life (even if we personally have known some).
Usually, however, a drug that causes 50 or 100 deaths is suspended and here we are now in the order of 20 thousand deaths between America and Europe and other countries following vaccinations AstraZeneca, J&J, Moderna and Pfizer (not to mention Sinovac who in Chile and Asia did even more damage).
Vaccination of the elderly and frail patients, given that we do not want to propose treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, can make sense. But for the rest of the population that is not really and has never been at Covid risk, the logic of vaccination does not make medical sense, it only serves to guarantee billionaire profits to multinational drug companies.
Thanks to our Telegram channel you can stay updated on the publication of new articles of Economic Scenarios.
The article Vaccinating you risk your life, but is it important to do so because you protect the most fragile? Paolo Becchi and Giovanni Zibordi comes from ScenariEconomici.it .
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/vaccinandosi-rischi-la-vita-ma-e-importante-farlo-perche-proteggi-i-piu-fragili-paolo-becchi-e-giovanni-zibordi/ on Sat, 17 Jul 2021 14:30:42 +0000.