The Fisherman of Dissent by Ennio Caruccio

Some of you have wondered how it is possible, in this period of hermetic and generalized censorship, that a social network like ? Without any of the politicians at the top tearing their clothes? And above all without any authority or media outlet shouting scandal? I think few people ask themselves this. In fact, I think that the fact that a less oppressive social network has been created that allows freedom of thought is seen in a favorable light. A long-hoped-for change that we obtained after legal battles, counter-information, signature collection and street demonstrations!

Well, sorry, I don't see it that way!
But let's go in order.
Shortly after Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter (rebranded "X") the first strange things began.
Unlike the old Twitter, a censoring, aligned social network,
inflexible (practically all "unwanted" terms were prohibited), we begin to see the first changes: reactivation of old blocked or suspended accounts, general amnesty for serial "sinners", extreme freedom of speech, no censorship of so-called "conspiracy" terms and etc.
And this is where my first doubts arise.

I'm starting to notice – within it – strange figures, highly followed accounts, with extreme visibility and diffusion, inexplicably promoted.
I say surprisingly promoted because they are strongly anti-system accounts and opposed to the single dominant thought.
After the FactChecker or the GateKeeper, the Disagreement's Fisherman (abbreviated DF) was also born. Many of them are absolutely unaware that they are. But some of them seem to act in a conscious and targeted manner!
This is the NEW strategy implemented, in my opinion, by the elite in this last period. The aim is to bring out – to “take the bait” – dissent. They do it, to have a more realistic vision of the "divergent" or worse, the opposition.
Having the true pulse of the situation and therefore cataloging and "filing" this world of protest.
In short, a modern species with different and new but always subtle objectives and tasks, as is their habit.

Taking a step back, in the old systems (also used now, but of an old concept) pressure cookers were used (like M5S so to speak) which served to contain dissent. Or the classic and reliable horizontal or transversal contrasts, if you prefer (no-vax vs yes-vax, Ukraine vs Russia, Palestine vs Israel) which served, as we well know, for disintegration. All this, added to the single thought of the press and TV, to the censorship of NON-mainstream thought, in the old Twitter, Youtube, Facebook etc. it was considered sufficient in the plans of the elites, but it was NOT! Despite the efforts, it seems that something hasn't worked (see for example new Vax campaigns, Trump remaining in the breach, elections in some EU countries and now Palestine). This is exactly why the DF enters the field! Inserted in the new Twitter managed by Elon Musk who, through his AI GROK (dedicated artificial intelligence) will do – in the visible part – the innocent assistance chat and – in the dark one – the "dirty" work of recording, memorizing, filing and cataloging dissent. Why X? Well, because it is the most reactive and immediate social network. Why Elon? Well, because he is “the unsuspected”. In short, “one of us”. Perfect as an infiltrated mole for an easy and abundant catch. I therefore believe that many will take the bait. Many will be registered in the "black book" because, confident that the bait thrown will be served by those who, being on our side, want to help us. But above all, it can save us from these elites!

In greeting you and thanking you for the time you have dedicated to me, I look forward to your comments, proposals and opinions.

---

---

The article The Fisherman of Dissent by Ennio Caruccio comes from Scenari Economici .

---

This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/il-pescatore-del-dissenso-di-ennio-caruccio/ on Sun, 12 Nov 2023 08:00:38 +0000.