The surveyor who judges the professor: the quality of the Italian “fact checkers”
Premise: long life to the surveyors, excellent professionals in their field and who solve, especially if they are experts, problems that higher technicians do not even know how to start facing. But no one would have a professor of medicine judged by a surveyor. Nobody, except Open, the newspaper that stands as the official Fact Checker.
The aforementioned newspaper is furious with Professor Peter Doshi, a professor at the University of Maryland's faculty of pharmacology, who has harshly criticized the lack of serious scientific data in the approval of vaccines and therefore the farce for which the current boom in cases it would be due to the unvaccinated. He basically touched on the dogma of the vaccine that solves everything, and he did so on the basis of scientific observations and data, including the fact that, if the vaccine is so useful, the boosters required now would not be needed.
His observations were harshly attacked by the Fact Checker who, unable to scientifically demolish them, said they were "Out of context" and that "They do not affect the soundness of EMA and FDA decisions".
The Fact Chcker is called Juanne Pili, he works for Open, and from his Linkedin page we learn about his studies
So a Professor of Pharmacology is judged by a Surveyor with not even a full degree.
Gentlemen, should we add more? No, we really think not. Use your head, judge the facts, not the partisan and paid fact checkers. You will make a better figure
Thanks to our Telegram channel you can stay updated on the publication of new articles of Economic Scenarios.
The article The surveyor who judges the professor: the quality of the Italian “fact checkers” comes from ScenariEconomici.it .
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/il-geometra-che-giudica-il-professore-l-qualita-dei-fact-checker-italiani/ on Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:50:06 +0000.