To avoid lockdown, they impose lockdown on us: on the wrong basis
To prevent us from lockdown, they put us in near lockdown. So there will be even more excuses for not compensating. Conte's statement on the alleged "vigorous recovery" of the economy is astonishing every time, almost as if it were a spite for the international director who wanted us already completely dead, a bit like a murderer who returned to the scene of the crime and was disappointed seeing that the victim still breathes!
In an almost deserted courtyard, with very few journalists, it is clear that the cut of Casalino must have intervened, perhaps with the obligation to present the questions a priori to avoid uncomfortable questions, and limited access for journalists. Otherwise how to explain to us that there will have been no more than a handful of journalists and no one on the screens from home. It stinks of cubed censorship. And it pairs up with journalists who have to ask the prefect for authorization to post themselves in a small square, without moving, in front of Palazzo Chigi.
The agony of the small restaurant and the cafeteria / pastry shop is declared which will be open from 5 in the morning to midnight, only with consumption at the tables otherwise only until 6 pm That is those very small shops without space, street vendors, small takes away are penalized. In other words, that Italic tradition of the takeaway pizzeria is killed, the tradition of eating on the street. In exchange, there is no limit for the home delivery service, while the take away only until midnight. The ratio? It is not clear how a virus would be less contagious if we are seated at the tables and not standing. It is clear that the concern is to carefully avoid gatherings. All these restrictions do not apply to hospitals, airports and highways where international chains now prevail.
Amateur contact sport and basic amateur competitions are prohibited. Local festivals and fairs are forbidden but national and international fairs are allowed, where the money goes around: again, large companies are preferred and small ones are discriminated against. Congresses and conventions suspended except remotely. Remote meetings in the public administration. Methods for resorting to smart working. The gyms will have a week to adapt the security protocols, otherwise they will be closed. They want at all costs to impose this divide et impera on us and give us a change of behavior. They want it to enter our cells especially of the youngest who are most reluctant, and of the children, who will be traumatized for life.
Of course, for the hypothesis of "refreshment" we always talk about the future, exactly like in March when "no one will be left alone" and it has been seen! The “rain” donation is declared over, let alone, of which many have only felt thirsty and that's it. Others with salt (loans). Unspeakable.
The emphasis placed on vaccines and monoclonal therapies is striking when now even the stones know that the best cure, in extremis, and also the cheapest is the donation of hyperimmune plasma.
Again, he repeats, international analysts were surprised by our economic results, see above, it seems to be annoying, because in the expected global economic monetary reset, the firm economy of the major world powers is a must, it is a must. Otherwise, how will we impose the total digitalization that begins with the common pass – supported by the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum – as a passport to return "free" to travel, naturally with a swab and then a vaccine? It is already being tested at some airlines and airports.
And the worrying contagion curve is always stressed, but let's look at the numbers.
First of all, they are 94.5% asymptomatic. And then they are 70/95% false positives due to the swabs: proof of this is that a scientific appeal has just been published that proves the falsity of the data from the swab, as per the leaflet, forwarded by the author of the appeal won to the Lazio TAR against the compulsory vaccine.
And then the data are doubly distorted, because today the new positives according to the dubious swab methodology were 9302 and not 11705, as they say; this is because, to the increase of the new positives of today (9302) they add the number of discharged / healed (2334) and the number of deaths (69). Honestly, the total of cases is not correct, if to the total infections we add the healed (ie the old infections already calculated at the time) and the deaths (idem): what is it, a trick as for the French compound interests?
With the numbers correct, today's positive increase is 6.34% and not 7.98%, but then again, the more asymptomatic positives the better, if they are asymptomatic. Extrapolated nationally, there should be nearly 4 million positives. Apart from that the swabs also detect the presence of other viruses, giving a positivity.
Out of the total number of positive cases, today we have 118356 inmates at home, under house arrest, asymptomatic and without a sure date of exit although the news has circulated that Sileri had arranged for the exit after a maximum of 21 days and also with a positive swab. Not received.
In intensive care, as for several weeks, 0.5% of "positive" cases, 0.0012% of the total population, deaths statistically nil and this despite the fact that deaths from heart attacks, accidents, drowning or deaths are also classified as covid other pathologies. A post mortem swab is enough, and that's it. But what is at stake? What are the funding?
In practice, here we dance with great numbers and their interpretation. And people fall for it. Crazy stuff. Perhaps many have to go back to school to learn the basics of Aristotelian mathematics, logic and rhetoric?
In all this, a pearl: the MES should not be accepted for all those reasons always supported by those who did not want it. In this regard, I quote Alberto Bagnai who telegramed:
One thing is certain: we are governed by those who arrive much later – often too late – and not by those who see things first.
The truth, however, sooner or later arrives, for those who know how to see it, but the problem is that currently there is a huge apparatus that wants to make it drown, always.
Nforcheri 18/10/2020
Thanks to our Telegram channel you can stay updated on the publication of new articles of Economic Scenarios.
The article To avoid the lockdown, they force us to lockdown: on the wrong basis it comes from ScenariEconomici.it .
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/per-evitarci-il-lockdown-ci-impongono-il-lockdown-su-basi-errate/ on Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:56:48 +0000.