On the order of business (3)
In a vain attempt to put my mail in order I come across this letter:
Dear Senator Bagnai
in a recent speech to the Senate you approached President Conte as "jurist and second office of the state", unfortunately the second office of the state was in the Chamber at that time and he had just entrusted you with the faculty to speak ……
What does that have to do with April 25? In my opinion it has to do.
You have all seen that in the courtroom I was just addressing my President, the one I elected, and who, as anyone who has not come down from Saturn knows, wants to be called "Mr. President" (not "Mrs. President"), because he loves the Italy and its language. So much so that when I then wanted to turn to what I do not want as President of the Council, because he despises democracy and Parliament, I explicitly called him Mr President of the Council. But then everyone knows that in the classroom we turn to the President of the Assembly, and even those who do not know after a while learn it: calls to order in this sense are frequent (art. 85 explicitly says that "the speakers speak to the Assembly ", which is to avoid bickering, and since" Madam Assembly "would not be well, the Assembly is addressed through the President, which the President just remembers every time the bickering starts, so avoid that Article 87 of the Regulations is triggered – and since you are so good, you will study it yourself …).
But above all, everyone should know what you have learned here . The long road of this blog, the one traveled together, and the one still to be traveled, is paved with suicide bombings by reckless drunks of their sicumera and clouded by their crass ignorance of facts, things and people, like our new friend otherwise spelling (punctuation is the sovereign marker : the suspension dots are strictly three).
Here, I wanted to tell you this: celebrating April 25, for me, means working, as I am working, to free even a poor fellow, one who thinks to teach me that Maria Elisabetta Alberti Casellati, not Giuseppe "Package" Conte, is the second state office. We cannot think of one like this to explain the precise political and rhetorical intention of addressing exactly the second office of the State in a speech in which I denounced the most violent attack on the Constitution ever perpetrated from 1948 to today: there are things that if they could be understood would not should be explained. A low lucidity of similar magnitude worries, at a time like this. But one must not be subject to the temptation to think: "Luckily there is a crisis: now he will come and get you, and you will have less time to disturb those who know more than you!"
Because he too, also this person to whom I had to devote a few precious seconds of my time, devastated by the uselessness and foolishness of his observation, is an Italian. Or, more prosaically, because even this person who had nothing better to do than putting his name and surname under this monumental proof of ignorance is a taxpayer, is someone's customer, and is the supplier, or worker, of somebody else.
Like it or not.
An organism is made up of many cells. Either we are all saved, or nobody is saved. This is what you asked me, and this is what I am trying to do. Maybe remember too. The fool who gets on your nerves always happens. Just avoid it. If we were to start only with those who understood what happened, we say that we would have to face a demographic crisis of large proportions. Never forget it. We will have to rebuild the country with those who have destroyed it and are destroying it.
(… no man left behind …)
This is a machine translation of a post (in Italian) written by Alberto Bagnai and published on Goofynomics at the URL https://goofynomics.blogspot.com/2020/04/sullordine-dei-lavori-3.html on Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:45:00 +0000. Some rights reserved under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.