Monday, April 29, 2024

Vogon Today

Selected News from the Galaxy

StartMag

Dagospia pumps Bisignani on Striano (how strange…)

2 months ago babelfish

Dagospia pumps Bisignani on Striano (how strange…)

Dagospia, Bisignani, Striano and beyond. Press review pills

DAGOSPIA'S OBSESSIONS

DAGOSPIA BISIGNANI PUMP ON STRIANO

WHAT BINDS DAGOSPIA AND DAILY FACTS

STRANGE STRANGE

THE SERVICES OF STRIANO OVERshadowed by TAJANI

THE DATABASE STRIPENER

CURIOSITIES ABOUT THE MELILLO AND CANTONE AUDITIONS

A THOUGHT ON POPE FRANCIS AND MORE

PAPAL PAPAL THE HEAD OF THE UKRAINIAN CHURCH…

POSTCARD FROM AMERICA

POSTCARD FROM RUSSIA

POSTCARD FROM CHINA AND BOLOGNA…

IL CORRIERE DELLA SERA PRAISES GUALTIERI

+++

EXTRACT FROM AN ARTICLE FROM THE CORRIERE DELLA SERA ON STRIANO AND SURROUNDINGS:

Today the "Striano case" turns one. In fact, the search of Financial Police lieutenant Pasquale Striano, already in service at the "SOS Group" of the National Anti-Mafia Directorate, dates back to 10 March 2023.

But just a couple of months before that search, at the beginning of 2023, the "Striano case" was on the verge of dying, without even being born; confined in the secrecy of an investigation by the Rome Prosecutor's Office ready to be closed in a few weeks, without the subsequent discoveries that now even call for a parliamentary commission of inquiry. If it didn't happen, it was only due to the decision of the Financial Police officer himself. And so, in addition to wondering about possible accomplices or hidden masterminds, we must ask ourselves: why did Lieutenant Pasquale Striano want to uncover the "wormpit" denounced by the Perugia prosecutor Raffaele Cantone?

After the complaint by the new Defense Minister Guido Crosetto on 31 October 2022, following three articles in the newspaper Domani with "precise and detailed" information on his assets, the Rome Prosecutor's Office took three weeks to identify the financier as the author of the accesses to the Revenue Agency database on the government representative. On November 21, the prosecutor in charge of the file, Antonia Giammaria, asked the deputy DNA prosecutor Antonio Laudati, head of the "SOS Group", for information on Striano's role, and within a month – after other acquisitions on the officer's telephones – the investigations are completed. The investigation responded to the minister's request to find those responsible for the "leak of information" concerning him, and the prosecutor Giammaria proposes to the deputy prosecutor with responsibility for computer crimes to notify Striano of the notice of conclusion of the investigations, which anticipates the request for indictment. The deputy, however, suggests calling the suspect first to obtain his version of the facts.

If Striano (who had already had almost two months' notice of the investigation against him, and therefore all the time for possible counter-moves) had made use of the right not to respond, as his right, or had limited himself to providing any justification for the research on Crosetto's account, the affair would have ended with the almost inevitable indictment and a probable conviction. But limited to abusive access relating to the minister, with the reasonable prospect of avoiding publicity of the news and further investigations.

+++

EXTRACT FROM A DAGOSPIA ARTICLE WITH BISIGNANI'S "THOUGHTS" ON THE STRIANO CASE AND MORE:

Why was Lieutenant Striano not stopped by the judicial authorities? And why, despite having been at the center of the story for months, there is no photograph of the financier seconded to DNA?

Bisignani notes: "I've never seen him, there isn't a Gabibbo, they didn't give him the tapir, there isn't that thing that the newspapers do, with anyone affected by an investigation, they go to the house, the intercom, you take his friends, here Striano instead is covered by a fantastic immunity…".

The answer to this singular enigma is given by “Bisi” himself: “It is certainly covered by someone”. Yes, but by whom? Is there a direction behind the unauthorized access and the leak of information? Is there the usual "grand old man" or is there an ongoing clash between powers with conflicting interests?

Bisignani points out a rather singular detail about the “ghost” Striano: “He was seconded in 2016 from the Financial Police to the anti-mafia. And a seconded person should no longer have access to the Financial Police's computer, while instead he was playing with these dossiers. At L'Espresso with Lino Jannuzzi and Peppe Catalano we were there talking about the same thing. And then there was Genchi, and then there was Pompa, it's a continuous practice…".

Another question arises spontaneously: when the chief prosecutor of Perugia, Raffaele Cantone, speaking of the leak of information following Striano's removal from the national anti-mafia prosecutor's office, says "The SOS market has not stopped at all […] There was someone who continued to sell the SOS under the table", uses the words "market" and "sell" with good reason? Were there any money transfers? Has anyone paid for confidential information? What happened to the documents?

Of the 50,000 files downloaded by Striano, only a handful were actually sent to reporters. As “il Messaggero” writes, “thousands of downloads performed by Striano from the databases have not been found and there are no traces of transmission to third parties (probably due to the reckless management of the file by the Rome prosecutor's office which immediately investigated it informing him of the complaints) while very few were sent to journalists".

Mysteries upon mysteries, which would suggest a long, tortuous investigation with sensational implications, yet Bisignani already has his own idea of ​​how the investigation by the Perugia Prosecutor's Office will end: "In a soap bubble, because these investigations always end Like this".

This is a machine translation from Italian language of a post published on Start Magazine at the URL https://www.startmag.it/mondo/dagospia-pompa-bisignani-su-striano-che-strano/ on Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:39:59 +0000.