Ddl Zan: a gigantic taking for a ride, if it did not have a very heavy criminal fallout
On May Day, sprawling on a longchair , I'm zapping , when suddenly from the video of TV channel 3 the aggressive face of a young guy, never seen and heard, jumps out, who, with a drumming tone of voice, claims that when he gets on stage he can say whatever the fuck he wants, useless to try to censor it as the deputy director of the network would have tried to do, with proof of a broken telephone dialogue. I said to myself lucky him! In a country where an ordinary citizen like myself cannot miss anything that is not politically correct, not even in a confidential conversation, because there is always someone who feels obliged to register you with a mobile phone, then spreading some urbi et orbi your word not aligned with the dominant stream , to expose yourself to general ridicule. But I heard it, while he listed with a lot of names and surnames a series of jokes, little or no commendable, from Northern League exponents, with the clear intention of attacking the League for its granite no to the bill known with the name of the deputy who arranged it, Zan.
I confess that it sounded a bit strange to me that from a stage set up for workers' day, even to hold a musical show, there was so much noise about that bill, not because it was out of theme with respect to the central argument, as constituted today from the profound employment crisis. Not for this or at least not only for this, but because it is extremely divisive, if it is true that many workers vote for the League, certainly sharing its program. I would have had a confirmation the next day: from the chorus of warm support of the whole left, now extended from Leu to the 5 Stars, with a Pd returning to a majority vocation as elastic, they abstained, at least as far as I know, just the union leaders. Acting as baritones Letta and Conte in tow, alone I would not have been able to understand the reason, except that my secretary struck me astonished, making me ashamed of my ignorance: “You don't know Fedez , one who has twelve million followers! ".
At this point I became curious. The fact that Fedez claimed to have been the victim of an attempted censorship, which however failed, "he was him", that is the one with the twelve million perched on his site, so as to arouse a certain movement of sympathy. But what on earth had they asked him to do, nothing less than to respect “the system”, a word that in itself recalled Orwell's “1984” ; but then, this terrible word resulted in observing an even obvious rule, of citing facts or statements of others, without them being able to reply. But as a law professor, albeit a bit fogged by the years, I had to take a look at that bill, which I had certainly heard about, but without giving it a look.
Said and done. The title was certainly tempting "Measures to prevent and combat discrimination and violence for reasons based on sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability". Apart from the fact that it was not possible to understand what disability had to do with it, even so included in the queue seemed the general category to which all the variants listed above could be traced. But if sex and sexual orientation sounded completely obvious, it remained to understand what is meant by gender and above all gender identity , so point and head to read Article 1. I confess that I am not saying as a jurist, but simply as a good person. sense I was stunned, because I had not doubted what sex meant … sex, that is constituted primarily by the genitals. This was only partially true, because under the lett. a) of that article, it was written that “by sex we mean biological or personal sex”.
In the meantime, we admit what has always been excluded from that ideological side, that is, that there is a biological sex, id est natural; then a bureaucratic sex is added, the one resulting from the registry office, when obviously it does not agree with the biological one. But then the third party will not even be able to be satisfied with the appearance, even if poorly concealed behind clothing that denies it, but will have to ask for an identity card. But here we are still far from the authentic pearl as constituted by the letter. d), according to which "gender identity means the perceived and manifest identification of oneself, even if it does not correspond to sex, regardless of having completed a transition path". It goes well beyond the registry office, so that an identity card is not enough, because if a person with a lot of mustache and beard, dressed in a masculine outfit, says that he feels like a woman, you must treat him accordingly, even if you seems to look like an idiot.
It would be just a kind of gigantic fooling around, if discrimination did not have a very heavy criminal impact, with the signing of a blank bill to the judiciary about its existence, because it is true that freedom of opinion is saved, but only ideas "Provided that they are not suitable for determining the concrete danger of carrying out discriminatory and violent acts". A sort of invitation to the repressive fury of our beautiful powers of attorney, with procedural queues destined to never run out, given the almost suppression of the prescription.
There is something else, much more serious, a sort of normalization, where the heterosexual couple, on which the family is founded, the real one, guaranteed by the Constitution as a "natural society founded on marriage", which constitutes the cell of physical reproduction and cultural, it becomes no more than a variant like any other in the long line of the rainbow family.
The post Ddl Zan: a gigantic taking for a ride, if it didn't have a very heavy criminal fallout appeared first on Atlantico Quotidiano .
This is a machine translation from Italian language of a post published on Atlantico Quotidiano at the URL http://www.atlanticoquotidiano.it/quotidiano/ddl-zan-una-gigantesca-presa-per-i-fondelli-se-non-avesse-una-pesantissima-ricaduta-penale/ on Thu, 06 May 2021 03:56:00 +0000.