CVD, trespassing provided for in the decree!

As we wanted to demonstrate, and as explained in the article The rhetoric of a manipulator , in the new decree of the president it is possible to enter the house to control PRIVATE PARTIES. Private parties at home with more than ten people are prohibited: the security forces will be able to enter the house to check. And weddings with more than ten guests will be INVALIDATED, funerals cannot have more than 15 people.

The decree is effective until May 31, 2020 !!! That is, after the end (??) of the extension of the emergency. Which of course they have already planned to repurpose. ( Decree of the President of the Council of Ministers 10 October )

First , there are no legal conditions to allow the violation of the domicile whose inviolability is sanctioned by the Constitution which specifies in article 14 that any inspections, searches or seizures are possible only in the cases and in the ways established by law according to the guarantees prescribed for the protection of personal freedom, that is with judicial decisions or for reasons of public health and safety, regulated by special laws.

Now the dpcm are not special laws, but administrative acts adopted in the context of an extension of an abusive state of emergency and not founded by law, as it is based on the legislation of the civil procedure which provides for states of emergency only in cases of natural disasters and NOT in cases of health emergencies.

Therefore this trespassing could possibly be justified by a court decision, and in any case be governed by a special law, of primary rank, which does not currently exist.

Second point , the data on which this "pandemic" is based are incorrect, FALSE, based on a swab sampling which, in addition to being invasive, does not offer reliable results because – as already mentioned in previous articles (1) – by admission of the producers of reagents, cause false positives for cross reactions with other pathogens and, as explained by several scientists and doctors, including Dr. Bassetti, generate a percentage of false positives, due to an amplified sensitivity in the test, which can range from 70 to 95%.

For those wishing to learn more, the candidate for the Nobel Prize for Medicine Dr. Scoglio explains it here https://www.facebook.com/notes/stefano-scoglio/i-tamponi-covid-19-producono-fino-al-95- false-positives-confirmed-by-the-institution / 10219184857114453 /

Third point, albeit on the basis of these data of oversized positives, whose victims are treated as plague victims to be segregated in hospitals or covid facilities, although they are symptom-free and at their expense, and whose number still grows disproportionately with the increase exponential number of illegal immigrants, if we statistically examine today's percentages we arrive at a ridiculously mild picture that I am about to explain.

Today, October 11, the Covid data was an increase of 5456 positives out of a total of 104658 tested, i.e. a percentage of 5.21% on the tested, an increase compared to recent days. Out of a total of 79065 total positives, 5419 are hospitalized with symptoms, i.e. 6.8% – increasing – while 420 are in intensive care (0.50% of positives), the others are in quarantine, asymptomatic, i.e. 92.7%.

If we take the percentage of the total population of 60 360 000 – a number that does not take into account the thousands of landings in recent weeks – the rate of hospitalized patients with symptoms compared to positive collapses to 0.09% while the rate of patients in intensive care falls to … ZERO . I have a nice try to put in the box of my calculation program the result of the percentage that represent 420 patients in intensive care out of a total of 60360,000 inhabitants, 0.00004% automatically rounds to 0.

If we then extrapolate the percentage of positives detected on the number of swabs carried out (5.21%) of the total population, we find that if we swab everyone today, they would be 3 144 756 asymptomatic positives throughout the country, and therefore we think about the thesis of eminent virologist Dr. Tarro who explained how the increase in the percentage of asymptomatic positives found on the number of swabs performed (also increased) is due to the spread of herd immunity. More positive, more asymptomatic, or hospitalized with mild symptoms. In intensive care, as stated by several doctors, there are those elderly patients who are debilitated with various previous diseases, who are then those who most easily become infected with nosocomial pathogens.

Third point, it would be interesting to understand how much funding is for covid hospitalizations and ICUs, and what happens to the ranking of Covid deaths – and ICUs – when every week we read stories, from the immediate relatives concerned, of deceased, classified covid but death of another. We regularly read about cases like these:

Now on the deaths, there are now 26 deaths, that is 0% of the total population and 0.00008% on the extrapolation of 3144756 positives today if they had swabs at all. That is statistically ZERO.

These are not opinions, they are indisputable statistics.

It amazes me that among all the professionals, lawyers, doctors, economists and politicians, no expert in statistics has come forward, maybe he would do better than me.

Point 4. If the situation were really so dangerous, then they would close the ports and instead they did the opposite, they canceled the security decrees and the landings of positive people multiplied.

Words are exhausted.

Nforcheri 12/10/2020

1. https://scenarieconomici.it/covid19-la-verita-sui-tamponi/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

---

---

Article CVD, trespassing provided for in the decree! comes from ScenariEconomici.it .

---

This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/cvd-violazione-di-domicilio-prevista-nel-decreto/ on Mon, 12 Oct 2020 02:58:48 +0000.