What doesn’t fit in the accounts of Draghi and Speranza
“If you torture the numbers long enough, they'll confess anything.” – Gregg Easterbrook
Draghi opening today at the press conference:
1) " Most of the problems depend on the no vax".
2) If the vaccination obligation for over 50 has arrived, it is to convince those who end up in intensive care: "We did it on the basis of data, essentially, which tell us that those over 50 run greater risks, intensive care two thirds are occupied by the unvaccinated ".
Let's skip for a moment on Draghi's consideration in point 1) and respond to that of point 2): TODAY, 10 January 2022, ICUs in Italy are 17% employed. So, for the sake of accuracy, assuming that Draghi's statement shows an exact percentage, if anything the Unvaccinated occupy two thirds of 17%, or 11.33%
This is just to respond to those who are anxious to scream: “They take away ALL the places for vaccinated people and patients with other diseases.
Now let's see what are the data for which they forced the over 50s to FORCE the vaccine. Unfortunately, the ISS provides aggregate data for the 40-59 range, updated to 4 January (they say) but still referring to the period from 12 November and December 12, 2021. Here they are:
As you can see from the table below, for every 100,000 people, the unvaccinated between 40 and 59 who enter the hospital are 87.2, of which 12.9 in intensive care. Of these, an average of 2.8 per week die.
And now we answer to point 1): how the unvaccinated people who occupy intensive care at 11.33%, who die an average of 76 per week out of a range of over 2 million and six hundred thousand people, can be THE GREAT PART OF THE PROBLEMS? If anything they can just be a problem for themselves. As we know they cannot infect vaccinated superprotected people. While the vaccinated (who can be infected and who can infect) can infect the unvaccinated.
Furthermore: they died in the ICU and were classified as NOT vaccinated. But did they die of Covid? All?
REMEMBER that the data examined refer to an age group of 20 years ranging from 40 to 59. The age group from 40 to 50 will be the next affected.
To conclude, these are the raw numbers. These are the data that do not take into account the victims of adverse reactions, victims of lost work and social hardship that the draconian measures they have taken by forcing the supergrenpass will cause. These are numbers that in our opinion do not justify laws that ONLY WE in Italy have adopted. It is appropriate to say that whoever lives will see. Both what they will be served and what social disaster they are bringing us.
Who knows if Hope and Draghi have really read them. Who knows especially if they have understood them. Who knows if they really weighed the pros and cons.
Here is the full PDF of the ISS:
https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/bollettino/Bollettino-soruardia-integrata-COVID-19_28-dicembre-2021.pdf
Thanks to our Telegram channel you can stay updated on the publication of new articles of Economic Scenarios.
The article What does not return to us in the accounts of Draghi and Speranza comes from ScenariEconomici.it .
This is a machine translation of a post published on Scenari Economici at the URL https://scenarieconomici.it/cosa-non-ci-torna-nei-conti-di-draghi-e-speranza/ on Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:23:55 +0000.