What the Five Eyes report on Sars-Cov-2 in China says
The in-depth study by Francesco D'Arrigo, director of the Italian Institute for Strategic Studies
Since American President Joe Biden decided to relaunch the investigation into the origin of Covid-19 the Wuhan laboratory's "conspiracy theory" seems to have reached the point of becoming a "conspiratorial reality".
Until now, the US intelligence community had focused around two probable scenarios on the origins of Covid, namely human contact with an infected animal or a laboratory accident, but has not identified a definitive trigger . By ordering the 007 Americans conduct further investigations, the US president has asked the intelligence services to redouble their efforts to collect and analyze information that can bring us closer to a final conclusion and give him a report on the pandemic origins within 90 giorn the .
Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal appears to have turned the case around by contacting researchers who believe the sequences of this coronavirus cannot have natural origins, disproving all speculation about the virus's origins from "bat soup", from " wet markets". "Or" pangolins ".
Scientists who have analyzed the structure of the novel coronavirus' RNA have found that its genetic sequences are "almost certainly" unnatural.
The essay published by the WSJ reports that “much of the analysis carried out has focused on circumstantial evidence: mysterious diseases at the end of 2019; the work of the Wuhan laboratory that intentionally supercharges viruses to increase their lethality, known as “ gain of function ” (research on the gain of function of viruses).
According to these researchers, “the most convincing reason that favors the hypothesis of the virus leaking from the laboratory is firmly based on scientific data. In particular, the report analyzes the genetic imprint of CoV-2, the new coronavirus responsible for the Covid-19 disease ".
Scientists say that the genetic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 "almost certainly" proves that it is an artificially manipulated virus developed in the laboratory.
“The CGG-CGG combination has never been found in nature. This means that the common method of viruses to acquire new developmental capabilities, called “ recombination ” (recombination), has not been detected and is not applicable to SARS-CoV-2, ″ the WSJ reads.
“A virus simply cannot take a sequence from another virus if that sequence is not present in any other virus in nature. C and G stand for Cytosine and Guanine, two amino acids which are building blocks of ribonucleic acid (RNA). Together with Adenine and Uracil, their sequence is very similar to an extremely complex code that is unique to each particular organism. In deoxyroobonucleic acid (DNA), Thymine is found in place of Uracil ”.
"At the very least, the fact that the coronavirus with all its random possibilities has taken on the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers – implies that the main theory of the origin of the coronavirus must be attributed to a laboratory leak," say the scientists.
The theory also confirmed by US government biostatisticians who calculated that the probability that the developed coronavirus evolved in nature is "about one in 13 billion."
But investigations into the origins of Covid-19 continue to reserve surprises and reveal data and events that increasingly point towards the hypothesis that the pandemic was caused by a leak during research or biological weapons trials conducted at the Institute of Wuhan virology.
According to a new report from the Five Eyes intelligence alliance , (the partnership between intelligence agencies between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States), a leading Chinese military scientist has filed a patent for the first Covid vaccine. -19 on February 24, 2020 and then mysteriously died a few weeks later.
Zhou Yusen, a scientist of the People's Liberation Army, allegedly had ties to Shi Zhengli, also known by the nickname " Bat Woman " at the Wuhan Institute of Virology .
According to The Australian , national security experts point to this event as further evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was conducting "covert military activities".
On The Weekend Australian we read:
“ Zhou, who conducted the research in collaboration with the Wuhan Institute, the University of Minnesota and the New York Blood Center, was the first to file a patent for a Covid-19 vaccine on February 24 last year. This patent registration took place just five weeks after China admitted the human-to-human transmission capability of the virus.
Zhou is listed as the lead inventor on the patent application filed by the "Institute of Military Medicine, PLA Academy of Military Sciences".
Another scientist, Flinders University medical researcher Nikolai Petrovsky explained how the creation of a COVID vaccine in such a short time would represent an "extraordinary result", "something we have never seen done before", assuming that the studies to achieve such vaccine may have been started a long time ago.
But only a few weeks after he filed the patent, Dr. Zhou would die.
The Five Eyes report reads that " his death was mentioned only in passing in a Chinese media article in July and at the end of a December scientific paper, both of which had the term – deceased – in parentheses after his name" .
" Although he was a very authoritative military scientist, there are no elements that pay homage to his research and his life as a scientist" .
According to what reported in The Weekend Australian, "the death of Dr. Zhou Yusen was treated in an unusual and suspicious way by the Chinese media and this event led to a further line of investigation within the new Five Eyes activity on the origins of Covid-19 launched by US President Joe Biden ".
The Daily Wire reports :
The Five Eyes report highlights that Dr. Zhou had conducted research testing spike proteins in coronaviruses and vaccine development. " Reports based on US intelligence show that the laboratory has collaborated on projects with the Chinese military."
The implications involving research on biological weapons are obvious, therefore, are very worrying recent disclosures that the National Institutes of Health and the NIAID managed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, have funded with several million dollars through these EcoHealth Alliance Group research run by the Chinese army.
On Friday, an article in the Daily Mail revealed the contents of a federal report, according to which the Department of Defense was instrumental in the US funding of this risky research carried out in the Wuhan laboratory. According to this report , the Pentagon would have disbursed several million dollars to the EcoHealth Alliance Group , a non-profit organization linked to Dr. Fauci that would then have turned part of this funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
According to "[F] ederal grant data" , Fauci's Charity – from 2017 to 2020 – would have received more than 123 million dollars from the US government, with the Department of Defense (DoD) one of its largest financiers with almost 39 million dollars.
The various information that is emerging from the investigations on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic are revealing a worrying scenario, where the Chinese government does not seem to be the only reticent about what happened in Wuhan.
For these reasons, President Biden has ordered US intelligence to carry out a thorough and serious investigation, the results of which must be provided to the US Congress and world public opinion, to avoid jeopardizing the confidence of Americans in their scientific community and in US security agencies.
This is a machine translation from Italian language of a post published on Start Magazine at the URL https://www.startmag.it/mondo/che-cosa-dice-il-report-di-five-eyes-su-sars-cov-2-in-cina/ on Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:53:10 +0000.